The Flammarion Woodcut

I bet you have seen this picture before. If not in black and white, then perhaps you’ve seen in it in colour. This is a much recycled illustration, reprinted many times, with or without adaptation, in various books, on book and magazine covers, posters and adverts.  This illustration is famous on at least two accounts. First, it is famous on account of its uncertain date and origin. For instance, Ernst Zimmer, a German historian of astronomy, thinks that the woodcut goes back to the early 16th centuty, to the school of Albrecht Dürer. Owen Gingerich, the historian of astronomy of Harvard University and the Smithsonian, is convinced that it occurs for the first time in Ernst Kraemers five-volume popular science book Weltall und Menschheit from 1907. However, two scholars, Arthur Beer, an astrophysicist and historian of German science at Cambridge, and Bruno Weber, the curator of rare books at the Zürich central library, have independently traced the illustration back to Camille Flammarion’s popular science book L’atmosphère: météorologie populaire from 1888.

Second, the illustration is famous on account of its rich symbolism which is taken to represent the mediaeval world-view. The illustration depicts a flat Earth bounded by the sky. The man, dressed as a mediaeval pilgrim and carrying a pilgrim’s stick, peers through the boundary and sees the hidden workings of the universe. The prominent element of the cosmic machinery in the top left corner looks like the “wheel in the middle of a wheel” described in the visions of the Hebrew prophet Ezekiel (1:4-26). You can learn more about the woodcut’s symbolism from the wikipedia page dedicated to it and from Kerry Magruder’s page. What you cannot learn there, however, is the following.

Look at the pilgrim’s stick. Curious place to lay it down, don’t you think? Why would the stick be laid down half protruding through the curtain of the sky? Here is an explanation. The illustration is probably making reference to a famous passage from Simplicius’ commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, in which Simplicius refers to Eudemus’ report of Archytas’ thought experiment. (Eudemus of Rhodes was Aristotle’s pupil who wrote a history of astronomy, and Archytas was a Pythagorean philosopher whom Plato knew and from whom he probably learnt much of what he says in the Timaeus.) Anyway, here’s Archytas question:

“If I came to be at the edge, for example at the heaven of the fixed stars, could I stretch my hand or my stick outside, or not? That I should not stretch it out would be absurd, but if I do stretch it out, what is outside will be either body or place.”

“Thus Archytas will always go on,” Simplicius recounts, “in the same way to the freshly chosen limit, and will ask the same question. If it is always something different into which the stick is stretched, it will clearly be something infinite” (In Arist. Phys. 467.26-32).

The Epicureans and the Stoics used and elaborated on Archytas’ argument for the infinity of space or void. Also, it is found in slightly different versions in Locke, Newton and Kant. Modern physics would answer that space could be finite without having an edge, as presupposed by Archytas’ argument.

Be that as it may, I think we have an explanation for the protruding stick. Whoever was the author of the woodcut, he seems to have known the original Archytas’ formulation of the argument which mentions stretching out “hand or stick”.

Advertisements

12 Responses to The Flammarion Woodcut

  1. Qualia Freak says:

    Second, the illustration is famous on account of its rich symbolism which is taken to represent the mediaeval world-view.

    I’m afraid I have to disagree. Any educated person in the middle ages, like Aquinas, for instance, believed the Earth was a sphere and not a flat surface how this woodcut conveys.

    • Pavel says:

      You are correct to claim that any educated person in the Middle Ages took the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic view of the shape of the Earth, but this does not contradict my claim. I claim that the illustration is taken to represent the mediaeval world-view, not that this was in fact the mediaeval world-view. Many moderns believe, quite mistakenly, that the Earth was taken to be flat in the Middle Ages, and that this was a salient part of the medieval, pre-scientific world-view. It is this unfounded belief that they find represented, and bolstered, in Flammarion’s illustration. So, no need to disagree.

  2. Pavel says:

    Incidentally, I recently read a delightful article by Dirk L. Couprie (“Tilting of the Heavens in Presocratic Cosmology”, Apeiron 42/4 [2009]) which explains how some astronomical observations in antiquity were interpreted in light of the flat-Earth hypothesis, and how these interpretations later got misconstrued by reporters who naturally held and never questioned the spherical-Earth hypothesis.

  3. This is a great post, Thanks!

  4. cp brakewell says:

    Hi. I needed to advise you that some parts of your web site are hard to comprehend for me, as I’m color blind. I suffer from tritanopia, however there are other sorts of color blindness that will also get difficulties. I will understand the largest part of the site OK, and those elements I have difficulties with I can read by using a adapted browser. In any case, it would be nice if you can consider us color-blind surfers while carrying out your next site design. Thanks.

  5. Thanks for some quality points there.

  6. Otha Marchi says:

    Thanks for sharing this helpful info!

  7. Cara Osborn says:

    So awesome that it’s as simple as going to Google and typing in a question to find your site. I wonder how many people get here from Google anyways, probably a lot! Thanks for the great post.

  8. Amazing structure and layout of your site. I’m so glad that I came by while searching on Google or I would’ve missed this great content.

  9. Angelina says:

    Hello, wow, this is top notch stuff, keep up the good work.Bye Bye

  10. GMBofWIS says:

    Interesting! I finally have a name by which to refer to this image. It would be nice to know the precise origin

  11. […] Respecto al cayado y Archytas de Tarento: enlace – Respecto a las ruedas de Ezequiel: enlace – Reproducciones del grabado original en blanco y negro […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: